But the Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie recently still had the courage to stand against her ex-husband Brad Pitt who is "bleeding her" financially after she claimed that he was doing so in the court. The whole world was startled by Jolie's emotional breakdown, and a celebrity divorce lawyer also got involved, as he gave an opinion about the bitter argument behind the famous divorce.
Although Jolie has stated that she is running short of funds as the proceedings of her long-documented dispute with Pitt over the kids' custody and his fortune are on the go, Pitt's team left no stone unturned to prove that Jolie's lifestyle choices and willingness to take on new projects were a result of her own wants and not out of financial desperation. Sources close to the actress tell us that she feels that such tactics, supported by financial demands, are against the law and are threatening the existence of a decent life of her kids.
Jolie allowed to tell her sad story without being afraid that she might be misunderstood, although in the candid interview she said with tears in her eyes that the divorce from Pitt was like a victim of his endless strong desire for wealth. She did not want to lose the battle, but the emotional strain on her and the additional financial impediments that Pitt was trying to put on her were just adding more cuts to her wounds.
Jolie's declaration of being violated has caused the attorney of Brad Pitt, who claims that Brad has not done anything wrong, to get angry very quickly. According to her lawyer, Angelina Jolie just wants a fair and proper adjustment or decision to the whole divorce process so that what's best for their kids is done, Pitt said.
The forthcoming accusations have additionally observed the interest of celebrity divorce attorney, she providing her opinions on the intricacies of high-profile divorce eruptions similar to Jolie and Pitt's. According to the attorney, these types of cases usually feature people being extremely emotional and fired up, as each party goes all-in for their money and the children.
The public input into the Jolie's and Pitt's legal struggle persists, leaving the population to form its own reaction towards the version of the facts they are being told. Jolie may have promoted herself as a victim to Pitt's finical claim, on the other hand, Pitt justifies that he expects the divorce procedure more or less equitable. Finally, the resolved result of this fight will be imperative to the fate of two parties in generations to come shaping not only their existence but also the life of their children.